This part delves into leadership philosophy, and thoughts of phenomenal characters through time. Notably, as we have learned in earlier collections regarding historical leadership, contemporary endeavors to decipher leadership tend to disregard the significant thoughts of historically renowned philosophers. In his work, Bass proves that leadership was an integral element of civilization: an inseparable one as it may seem. Additionally, it is common knowledge even today that good leadership is key, and has been the key to economic growth in many societies around the world. Observers such as Aristotle, Lao-tzu, Du Bois, Gandhi, and Machiavelli were a myriad of thoughts about leadership though from different perspectives, culture, as well as, time periods yet they all seemed to agree on one thing that great leadership is the key to success for any civilizations. This follows that history, which is the platform for judgment, puts the leadership skills of the great leaders on the weighing scale to see whether they made a wise a poor choice.
The philosophers put down the qualities of a good leader: the role of leadership and the followers too. Every of these elements plays a pivotal role in leadership because one cannot exist without the other. In defining a leader was and what leadership is, the great historical minds tended to differ among themselves: notably, one of such collisions was between Aristotle and his mentor Plato this was because each of them lived in time when different leaderships were at play. Plato tasted democracy while Aristotle survived a time marked by greed for power and tyranny it is this contrast that is observable in their view point’s concerning leadership.
Another pair of philosophers who differed on how leaders should behave existed between the Machiavelli and Lao-tzu. Machiavelli observed that leaders should deceive their subjects so as to remain in power but Lao-tzu a Chinese philosopher articulated that leaders should be selfless. The contemporary historians also seem to hold the same kind of observation. Looking back, into the past it is worth noting that leadership expectations have not changed. Leadership expectations have remained solid overtime as observed from the works of the philosophers.
Buy custom Leadership 3B essay
|← Condemned Modernist Ideas||Water Security →|